It’s a sandal! It’s a boot! It’s .. sasquatch? How these shoes by Etro don’t get less praise and more jabs than Uggs is beyond me. I didn’t pay them much mind until I read recent reports saying these … yes, these hair-like fringy tall shoes, are the IT shoe of Spring 2008.

Ummmm at least they conceal those missed patches??

Lewis Black and his gang won’t need to debate on this issue, because the two crusaders of the dark side have teamed up to make this shoe:

Croc Mary Janes (in purple here) with Hannah’s name on the foot strap and her likeness on the heel strap. Complete with holes, this is the brainless child of Satan and his young mistress.

Of course, how bad the Crocs’ guilt goes lies within the question: are Crocs okay on Kids? But that Miley Cyrus is certainly dastardly in her world domination (and demon-ination). It’s she I stand less!

What about you?

Source

I only added a few choices here, so please add your own if you’d like!

For our first new poll now that we’re BACK!: Which trend is as tired as an unposted-to blog / non-updated poll, itself???

Scrolldown!
..
..

These pants go way far too beyond skinny jeans. I barely recognize them as being denim (don’t they kind of resemble a blue heather fleece?) And then we get to those sneakers. Lindsay looks like her feet belong on a teenaged boy. That ensemble is an insult to her fantastic patchwork handbag.

By the way, I was out of the fashion game for a while, and now cannot find this bag anywhere after a day’s research - can you name it or the designer?

DesignerElla says,

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!

Source

As a young girl, when I saw Hammer Pants, they appeared to me to be nothing more than ultra silly pajama pants.

Now I’m all adult, thank you, and you know what I see in this 2008 version? Inhumanly, mutantly large penis pants. I mean the wearer’s member mustn’t be able to fit into your regular pair of jeans or trousers.

Wait - are these for women?

Man, that is so hot. I love a loose, slouchy crotch on a woman. Who wouldn’t want a piece of that?

Source

I don’t always enjoy cattiness toward the undeserving, unlike the cattiness that was pleaded for in my last post. But Gwenyth’s ensemble here is so heinous of the subtle *But-I’m-wearing-all-designer* disgusting way that I find it amusing as one of the first posts to bring me to start upon the new life of Kiss Me, Stace. It’s no new thing to rag on celeb unfab, and I haven’t changed my mind about its propriety, yet I now want to write freely for a while to discover every little aspect of what Kiss Me, Stace will evolve into!

Besides, just look!

Let’s start at the very tippy-toe bottom (and right above this text). Those shoes. They say “Givenchy gladiator pumps”, I say “orthopedics meet torture.” She looks like she has ankle braces atop strappy sandals. (Warning: this could happen to YOU, stiletto freaks.)

Then the dress, some think it’s a fine frock, a vintage YSL. (I usually love them, but WHAT? Was this before their aesthetic actualization?) I see it as an oversized housecoat, or better yet, a fanschay yet still oversized medical gown — to fit a theme. Please tell me Gwynny is nursing a new oddly-named baby rght now, ‘cos you know I don’t follow celebrity gossip too much to know myself.

Then there are those long, poofy sleeves, and some unfortunate effects coming from poor posture, an uneven hem and a hanging beltamajig. This vintage dress seems to be more *all I could find in a consignment shop* than a gift from the designer themselves. Sad. sad.

Someone get Ms. Paltrow a dose of style-sanity, STAT!