I must say it, Sandra Bullock’s Bridal “Shoes”
July 30, 2005 by Designer EllaFinally, I must say something. I let the happy honeymoon days exist in peace, but enough time has passed.
Sandra Bullock, a unique wedding I do applaud, but cowboy boots under your white gown do just not go. It’s not even about my opposition to the footwear style, or even completely about the inappropriateness of ultra-casual mixing with ultimate glam. The dream wedding gown should be matched with complimentary, elegant, and petite shoes. If you must state something bold and wear western - or hillbilly, as I see was the intent with this gala - accessories, at least take the different route of wearing a simpler, darker shaded dress, like a matte bronze slip-dress cut to the knee. Then you must throw in the topaz stone necklace. It is the gem of the setting sun, and this was an affair meant to represent beauty of the natural, mixed with its complimentary aspects of hot and wild, no?
In my pretend French: Jés! In British: Bullocks!
Comments Off > email > delicious it > Add to Stylehive > Coutorture It


RSS


I’ve stayed away from the whole Tom/Katie disastrous “plot,” because I just figured they weren’t crossing my territory. But now they’ve become offensive to the style world, and are apparently actually fooling people, this time(?)
Ryan Seacrest is starting his own “humorous” fashion label, “R,” but the word, “fashion” is used loosely by me.














